top of page

Social Ties and the Political Participation of Firms

Cesi Cruz and Benjamin A. T. Graham (2022)

The Review of International Organizations

Main Findings

  • Firms with social ties to political elites are significantly more likely to participate in politics.

  • Social connections reduce the perceived costs and risks of lobbying and campaign donations.

  • The effect of social ties persists even after accounting for firm size, industry, and resources.

  • Corporate political participation is shaped by informal social networks, not only strategic calculation.

One-page structured summary

Research Question

How do social ties between firm managers and political elites affect firms’ decisions to engage in political participation?

Core Argument

Cruz and Graham argue that social ties lower barriers to political participation by reducing uncertainty and increasing confidence in the effectiveness of political engagement. Firms embedded in elite social networks perceive political activity as more accessible and less risky, making participation more likely.

Data and Methods

The authors combine data on firm political activity—such as lobbying and campaign contributions—with information on social connections between firm managers and political elites. Statistical models isolate the effect of social ties from firm size, industry, and other confounding factors.

Key Findings

Socially connected firms are more likely to engage in political activity, particularly informal forms such as campaign donations. These effects are not driven solely by firm resources, indicating an independent role for social networks.

Implications

The findings suggest that access to political influence is unevenly distributed through social networks. Informal relationships can reinforce inequalities among firms and shape patterns of political participation beyond formal institutional channels.

Questions and Answers

Do social ties help firms participate in politics?

Yes. Cruz and Graham (2022) show that firms with social connections to political elites are more likely to engage in lobbying and campaign finance.

Why do social ties matter for political participation?

Social ties reduce uncertainty and transaction costs by providing information and trust, making political engagement appear more effective and less risky.

Are social ties just a proxy for firm size or wealth?

No. The authors demonstrate that social ties have an independent effect even after controlling for firm resources and industry.

What does this imply for political inequality?

If political participation depends partly on social networks, firms without elite connections face higher barriers to influence, reinforcing unequal access to policymaking.

Full structured exposition

Introduction

The paper addresses variation in firm political participation, moving beyond purely resource-based explanations to highlight the role of social embeddedness.

Theory

Social ties facilitate political participation by lowering informational and relational barriers between firms and political elites.

Empirical Strategy

The authors analyze observational data linking firm political behavior with elite social networks, using statistical controls to isolate causal relationships.

Results

Firms with social ties engage more frequently in political activity, especially in discretionary forms such as campaign contributions.

Discussion

These findings highlight the importance of informal networks in shaping political access and influence in democratic systems.

References and PDF

Citation

Cruz, Cesi, and Benjamin A. T. Graham. 2022. “Social Ties and the Political Participation of Firms.” The Review of International Organizations 17 (1): 117–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-021-09420-6.

PDF and Related Materials

Link to Journal page.

bottom of page